> I'v been doing a little research into the nature
> of genius. I discovered that DaVincci's and
> Einstein's only come along once in a great while.
>
> Evolutionerily, this made little sense. It would
> seem that if intelligence were a survival trait,
> then such genius would be encouraged. And since
> it is obviously a genetic possibility, it was
> quite a dilemma.
>
> But as my research progressed, it began to seem
> that society could only support a genius after
> the last one had seen its effects out to their
> full duration.
>
> As the population increased, the innovation were
> put to use with more efficiency. As I looked at
> population and time between geniuses, there was
> an undeniable corrilation. An Einsteinian genius
> emerges roughly every 150 billion man-years.
>
> Figuring the population boom since Albert's
> hey-day, we're rollin around to man year 120
> billion. Which means that in little under 3
> years, a genius of Einstein's caliber will
> emerge.
>
> Further more population density seems to play a
> role in lesser,follow up geniuses. Leonardo
> inspired countless other artists.
>
> The implications speak for themselves. What
> we're looking at in the near future is another
> rennisance (I cannot seem to spell this word).
>
> This genius lives among us now. Chances are not
> too bad that you know him/her.
>
> Do you have any canidates? Nominate them here.
> Let's get to know them, if you're right, we may
> be able to get a look at a promisi

I nominate the most obvious genius of all, Sam, there are many reasons that he should lead the way.

1. I think it's obvious to everyone that Blood Drops won the duel of the ages.

2. Two words, "I think"

3. A sense of humor is a sign of intelligence.

Vote Same!