> One problem with the world surviving the Y2k bug is that now we're going to have to put up with a
> lot of idiots talking about the Y3k bug.
> Which doesn't exist.
> The next date we have to worry about is Y10k.

On further reflection, I take that back.
As long as there are lazy programmers in the world, we're going to have to go through some version of this every hundred years.

Pa"pointedly not looking at date stamp"ul