> > First of all, I'd like to say "Hello" since this is my first time posting here.
>
> Hi! I hope you stick around and post again.

ditto.

> > He was under oath and lied. If any of us lie under an oath, especially in court, we could end up in jail. The impeachment, as I understand it, is like a conviction in court, but not the sentencing for the crime. He has been found guilty of perjury. The next step is the "sentencing".
>
> The analogy holds to an extent, but it's misleading in that it trivializes the importance and immense ramifications of such an action. It's better, I submit, to get rid of the analogy forever. Rather than taking action *like* trying and sentencing him, what's wrong with doing just that?
>
> So try him in a criminal court. If he's found guilty, convict and sentence him. That's what would happen to anyone else who did the same thing -- you wouldn't get *fired*, you'd get tried in a criminal court.
>
> The kicker of it all is that he's never going to get booted out of office. This is a partisan attack, and the Republicans control 55%, not 67%, of the Senate. That's the whole ridiculous thing. It's like Captain Ahab, abandoning all sense and sanity to kill the white whale, knowing full well in advance he couldn't possibly succeed.

you got it. this is all so pointless, nothing's gonna come out of this.

nice literary example =)

Dalí