Re: Iss vs. "is is"
Joona I Palaste, on host 88.114.94.125
Saturday, October 14, 2006, at 10:58:12
Re: Iss vs. "is is" posted by daniel78 on Friday, October 13, 2006, at 17:56:53:
> I'm going to add a couple of my big annoyances. Virtually every native English speaker uses various contractions when speaking, but some people don't seem to know what some of them mean. Things like "would have" get shortened to "would've." BUT--and I hate this--I have seen IN PRINT, instead of using "would've," people will write "would of," which is not only incorrect, it also makes no sense. > Another thing I strongly dislike is when people mindlessly use filler words such as "you know." An occasional use is fine, but not four or five uses in two consecutive sentences. Sometimes I feel like yelling, "No, you idiot, I don't know. I'm waiting for you to tell me."
I've never heard the "is is" thing either. Is this one for you native-English-speaking types only? But I agree, I've also seen those "would of" and "you know" things, and they annoy me too. In Finnish also, a lot of people keep saying "niinku". It means "such as" or "like", but is used like that "you know" that you mentioned.
|