| 
 Re: Movie Ratings 
 Ferrick, on host 169.237.131.64
  Friday, July 9, 2004, at 08:58:08
  Movie Ratings posted by uselessness on Friday, July 9, 2004, at 06:31:18:
Without a doubt, The Sting would be PG-13 today, a rating that didn't come into being until 1984 after Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, a movie with some fairly dark scenes, was given a PG rating.  Red Dawn was the first movie released with a PG-13 rating.  And what a thrill it was for me as a 12 year old to see it with my friend, also 12, with his parents in the movie next door.
  Fer"They let us in!"rick 
  > I was under the impression that movie ratings were getting  > more lenient over time... gradually more and more  > "inappropriate" material seems to be slipping into films  > with lower and lower ratings. I'm amazed at *how much*  > they'll allow into a PG-13 movie these days. But perhaps I  > was wrong in thinking that it's getting worse with time... > > When you think of films rated PG, what movies come to  > mind? Probably kids' stuff. "Air Bud," "Stuart Little" and "Spy  > Kids" were all rated PG. So was the 1973 heist movie "The  > Sting." I just borrowed this movie from the library on DVD  > and watched it for the first time two days ago. I was  > expecting a light family-friendly comedy about bumbling  > crooks, but that's not what I found, at all. > > "The Sting" is riddled with profanity, adult themes, alcohol  > and tobacco use, and violence. I heard the S-word, "SOB,"  > and "n****r" all many times. Granted, the latter may have  > been more acceptable in 1976 than it is today, and the  > movie does take place in the 1930s. But I was still  > surprised. There is also a scene of topless women dancing  > on a stage (wearing pasties, but still)... It seems like  > everywhere you look in the movie, someone is drinking like  > a fish or smoking like a chimney. And there's plenty of  > gunfire: three people are shot onscreen, two in the chest  > (with blood all over their shirts) and one in the forehead (a  > big bloody hole between her eyes). And finally, even if the  > movie's content WAS suitable for children, the movie goes  > at such a slow pace that most kids would likely be bored  > out of their minds. > > So how does a film like this get the PG rating? Is this a sign  > that the rating system has actually gotten stricter over the  > years? If this movie came out today with that kind of rating,  > I think a lot of people would be up in arms. What are your  > thoughts on the matter? > > -useless"Has anyone here seen the movie?"ness 
 |