| 
 Re: what's "regular joes" 
 uselessness, on host 207.203.212.2
  Tuesday, February 10, 2004, at 21:48:03
  Re: what's "regular joes" posted by Platypi007 on Tuesday, February 10, 2004, at 19:31:55:
> Worked REALLY hard to support his 11 kids, his wife, and  the family dog; thus the need for the dozen boxes of  cereal.
  Well, y'know, times were different in those days. They didn't  have none of those "Froot Loops" or "Lucky Charms" back  then. No sir, all they had were "shredded pine bark" and the  occasional bowl of "hay with berries." Breakfast foods as we  know them were still a long way off, and with the war effort  underway, there were no inexpensive alternatives. Many  people simply skipped the meal in those days. The  traditionalists, however, settled for whatever they could  get, thankful that the decreased demand had lowered  cereal prices (most grocers had to PAY people to eat the  stuff). Thus, it wasn't uncommon for households like the  Average family to purchase cereal in bulk, to take  advantage of the low prices while they were still in effect.  After all, the landscape of cereal variety would change  drastically in the next three years, culminating with the  advent of "corn flakes," which marked the dawn of a new  era -- a time when breakfasts had become so enjoyable  that the public was desensitized to the perils of eating food  that doesn't use torture as a means of contributing to one's  character.
  -useless"glad I stayed awake in that economics class"ness 
 |