| 
 Re: Real Music 
 Jezzika, on host 24.55.102.6
  Thursday, December 6, 2001, at 23:32:01
  Real Music posted by Grishny on Tuesday, December 4, 2001, at 13:44:46:
> Okay, here's my opinion. Billy Joel has some  > catchy tunes. So do a host of others. But will  > they stand the test of time? How do we know  > their popularity isn't just a flash-in-the-pan  > phenomenon? >
  So what if they are?  Why should we get all cerebral and pretentious over what music appeals to us?  It's called pop music for a reason.  I don't feel like writing an essay entitled "The Enduring Worth Of The Police" just because I think they're cool. :)
  > How 'bout this: Bach, Beethoven, Mozart,  > Vivaldi, Brahms, Chopin, Mendelssohn, Liszt,  > Berlioz, Strauss, Wagner, Puccini, Haydn,  > Handel, Tchaikovsky, Katchaturian, Mahler,  > Boccherini, Saint-Saens, DeBussy, and Tallis  > rule. Billy Joel and the host of others... they  > rock. > > Gri"c'est mon avis"shny
  Maybe only 1% of the Earth's population know who those composers are, and a small fraction more only know their music from Warner Bros cartoons.  So do they *really* rule? 
 |