| 
 Re: Does anyone... 
 akscully, on host 164.68.11.26
  Thursday, November 29, 2001, at 10:51:00
  Does anyone... posted by SilverMoon on Wednesday, November 28, 2001, at 16:34:08:
France.  I know, I know, no one likes the French, but French naval and  military intervention kept the (soon to be) Americans going.  British  navy had a pretty good blockade going, but with the arrival of the  French, Britain was no longer dealing with just a colonial navy.   Shipping could get through and the trans-Atlantic trade (a key  element in American wealth) could continue.  In addition, there was a  very real possibility that this little rebellion could escalate into another  France/Britain slugfest if it continued any longer.  Which happened  anyways in a few years.  So, that along with all the other reasons  mentioned (logistics and American tactics are big ones), Britain  pulled out.  
  As for the American commanders...well, they weren't that great.  On  the whole, they were so-so at best.  Most of the British generals  were better tacticians (of the "line up and fire" style of war), but either  they were more interested in living it up in the colonies, or couldn't  adjust to the terrain and "ungentlemenly" tactics of the Americans.
  ak"new to this board so...Hey Everyone!"scully
  P.S. Oh, almost forgot.  The British people themselves weren't  wildly for the war.  There were a considerable number of people  who just wanted to let the colonies go if they were going to be so  much trouble.  So, not much support on the home front was also a  factor. 
 |