| 
 Re: What do you have against thinking? 
 Ferrick, on host 207.90.138.9
  Thursday, September 14, 2000, at 12:49:21
  Re: What do you have against thinking? posted by Sam on Wednesday, September 13, 2000, at 16:54:01:
> In an ideal world, where moral lines are clearly drawn, I'd agree with you.  I agree that there exists a moral standard by which some media is unequivocally immoral and should not exist. >   One of the aspects of our world that I find absolutely fascinating and utterly frustrating is where people decide to draw their lines.  
  ***Note:  The following is an example of this and not intended to begin a new discussion on the specific issues.  That can be a new thread, if you want.
  Example:  People decide that they don't want children reading certain books but also think that minors should be able to have abortions without any parental knowledge/consent.  This does NOT mean that everyone who believes A always believes B, as well, but some people do.  I'm sure you can come up with other possible paradoxes as well, whether you agree with them or not.
  Ferrick 
 |